DESCOMPRESSAO ENDOSCOPICA DO TUNEL DO CARPO

(especial para SIIC © Derechos reservados)
A cirurgia endoscópica para descompressão do túnel do carpo oferece as mesmas taxas de efetividade da cirurgia convencional, adicionando-se vantagens como manutenção da força de preensão da mão operada e retorno mais rápido dos pacientes às suas atividades de trabalho.
prettoflores9.jpg Autor:
Leandro Pretto flores
Columnista Experto de SIIC

Institución:
Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal


Artículos publicados por Leandro Pretto flores
Recepción del artículo
8 de Mayo, 2007
Aprobación
23 de Agosto, 2007
Primera edición
16 de Noviembre, 2007
Segunda edición, ampliada y corregida
7 de Junio, 2021

Resumen
O tratamento cirúrgico convencional da síndrome do túnel do carpo provou ser altamente resolutivo, além de simples e seguro. Porém, o procedimento exige uma incisão sobre o punho, o que pode trazer problemas ocasionais, como dor na cicatriz, diminuição da força de preensão da mão operada, deiscência de ferida operatória, entre outros. A descompressão endoscópica do carpo é uma cirurgia minimamente invasiva, que tem entre seus potenciais benefícios a diminuição da morbidade pós-operatória. Desde o seu surgimento, diferentes técnicas foram desenvolvidas, sendo que atualmente as mais utilizadas são a monoportal - Agee - e a biportal - Chow. A cirurgia endoscópica, independentemente da técnica utilizada, apresenta os mesmos resultados obtidos com a técnica convencional aberta, porém demonstrando algumas vantagens, como: diminuição do tempo de recuperação pós-operatório, manutenção da força de preensão da mão operada e minimização da ocorrência de algumas complicações relacionadas à ferida operatória. O objetivo deste trabalho é, além de apresentar as bases teóricas do uso desta técnica cirúrgica, revisar as mais recentes publicações sobre o tema. Também objetiva relatar observações do autor baseadas em sua experiência pessoal com o uso da técnica.

Palabras clave
síndrome do túnel do carpo, descompressão endoscópica, nervos periféricos, nervo mediano, retináculo dos flexores


Artículo completo

(castellano)
Extensión:  +/-5.71 páginas impresas en papel A4
Exclusivo para suscriptores/assinantes

Abstract
The conventional surgical treatment of the carpal tunnel syndrome has proved to be highly effective, safe and simple. However, as the procedure involves an incision on the wrist and the hand, it may result in potential complications, as wound pain. The endoscopic carpal tunnel release is a minimally invasive surgery that offers the possibility to decrease the post-operative morbidity. To date, the most common endoscopic approaches used in the clinical practice are the Agee single-portal and the Chow dual-portal techniques. The endoscopic surgery has demonstrated the same results of the open surgery concerning the resolution of the patient's symptoms, associated to some potential advantages: shortening of the post-operative time of recovery, preservation of the dexterity and strength of the operated hand; and decreasing of the incidence of complications related to the operative wound. This paper aims to present the theoretical basis and the most recent reported data about the use of this surgical technique. Comments about the author's personal experience with the technique will also be presented.

Key words
carpal tunnel syndrome, endoscopic release, peripheral nerves, median nerve, flexor retinaculum


Clasificación en siicsalud
Artículos originales > Expertos de Iberoamérica >
página   www.siicsalud.com/des/expertocompleto.php/

Especialidades
Principal: Cirugía
Relacionadas: Medicina Interna



Comprar este artículo
Extensión: 5.71 páginas impresas en papel A4

file05.gif (1491 bytes) Artículos seleccionados para su compra



Enviar correspondencia a:
Leandro Pretto Flores, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal Unidade de Neurocirurgia, 70853-060, SQN 208 - Bloco F - Apartamento 604 - Asa Norte, Brasilia, Brasil
Bibliografía del artículo
1. Shapiro S. Microsurgical carpal tunnel release. Neurosurg Focus 3:123-35, 1997.
2. Pagnanelli DM, Barrer SJ. Outcome of carpal tunnel release surgery in patients with diabetes. Neurosurg Focus 3:54-78, 1997.
3. Bradley MP, Hayes EP, Weiss AP, Akelmam E. A prospective study of outcome following mini-open carpal tunnel release. Hand Surg 8:59-63, 2003.
4. Klein RD, Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Open carpal tunnel release using a 1-centimeter incision: techinique and outcomes for 104 patients. Plast Recontr Surg 111:1616-22, 2003.
5. Chow JC, Hantes ME. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: thirteen years experience with Chow technique. J Hand Surg (Am) 27:1011-8, 2002.
6. Agee JM, Peimer CA, Pyrek JD, Walsh WE. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a prospective study of complications and surgical experience. J Hand Surg (Am) 20:165-71, 1995.
7. Ketschmer T, Antoniadis G, Borm W, Richter HP. Pitfalls of endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Part 2: conclusions from findings of open surgery. Chirurg 4:234-7, 2004.
8. Robbins H. Anatomical study of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel and etiologies of the carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 45:953-966, 1963.
9. Schimidt HM, Lanz U. Anatomy of median nerve in the carpal tunnel. In. Gelberman RH (ed). Operative nerve repair and reconstruction. Philadelphia: JB Lippicott Company, pp. 889-898, 1991.
10. Lanz U. Anatomical variations of median nerve in the carpal tunnel. J Hand Surg 2:44-53, 1977.
11. Tillman B, Gretnkord K. Verlauf des nerve medianus in canalis carpi. Morphol Med 1:61-9, 1981.
12. Poisel S. Ursprung und verlauf des ramus muscularis des nervus digitalis palmaris communis I (N. Medianus). Chirurg Praxis 18:471-4, 1974.
13. Jimenez DF. Endoscopy for carpal tunnel decompression. In. King W, Frazee J, De Sales A (eds). Endoscopy of the central nervous and peripheral nervous system. New York: Thieme Medical Pub 215-31, 1998.
14. Agee JM, Peimer CA, Pyrek JD, Walsh WE. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a prospective study of complications and surgical experience. J Hand Surg (Am) 20:165-71, 1995.
15. Rabb CH, Kernan JC. 3M agee carpal tunnel release system. Neurosurgery 40:639-41, 1997.
16. Thomas A, Veltri K, Haines T, Duku E. A systematic review of reviews comparing the effectiveness of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompressions. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1184-91, 2004.
17. Wong KC, Hung LK, Ho PC, Wong JM. Carpal tunnel release. A prospective, randomized study of endoscopic versus limited-open methods. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:863-8, 2003.
18. MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Roth JH, Ross DC, King GC. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a randomized trial. J Hand Surg (Am) 28:475-80, 2003.
19. Missitzi J, Missitzis D. Evaluation of dexterity and strength after open carpal tunnel release: a one year follow-up. J Hand Surg (Am) 28:70-1, 2003.
20. Kiritsis PG, Kline SC. Biomechanical changes after carpal tunnel release: a cadaveric model for comparing open, endoscopic and step-cut lengthening techniques. J Hand Surg (Am) 20:173-80, 1995.
21. Bozentka DJ, Osterman AL. Complications of endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Hand Clin 11:91-5, 1995.
22. Chow JC. Ulnar nerve transection as a complication of two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg 19:522, 1994.
23. Benson LS, Bare AA, Nagle DJ, Harder VS, Williams CS, Visotsky JL. Complications of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release. Arthhroscopy 22:919-24, 2006.
24. Oertel J, Schroeder HW, Gaab, MR. Dual-portal endoscopic release of the transverse ligament in carpal tunnel syndrome: results of 411 procedures with special reference to technique, efficacy, and complications. Neurosurgery 59:333-40, 2006.
25. Quaglietta P, Corriero G. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release surgery: retrospective study of 390 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir Suppl 92:41-5, 2005.
26. Rab, M, Grunbeck M, Beck H, Haslik W e cols. Intra-individual comparison between open and 2-portal endoscopic release in clinically matched bilateral carpal syndrome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:730-6, 2006.
27. Nesbitt KS, Innis, PC, Bubin NH, Wilgis EF. Staged versus simultaneous bilateral endoscopic carpal tunnel release: an outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 118: 139-45, 2006.
28. Teoh LC, Tan PL. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome after previous open release. Hand Surg 9:235-9, 2004.
29. Nagaoka M, Nagao S, Matsuzaki H. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release in the elderly. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 49:216-9, 2006.
30. Harada K, Nakashima H, Teramoto K, Nagai T, Hoshino S, Yonemitsu H. Trigger digits-associated carpal tunnel syndrome: relationship between carpal tunnel release and trigger digits. Hand Surg 102:205-8, 2005.
31. Hong JT, Lee SW, Han SH e cols. Anatomy of neurovascular structures around the carpal tunnel during dynamic wrist motion for endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Neurosurgery 58:127-33, 2006.
32. Chow JC, Weiss MA, Gu Y. Anatomic variations of the hook of the hamate and the relationship to carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg (Am) 30:1242-7, 2005.
33. Okutsu I, Ninomiya S, Yoshida A, Hamanaka I, Kitajima I. Measurement of carpal canal and median nerve preassure in patients with carpal tunnal syndrome. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 8:124-8, 2004.

 
 
 
 
 
 
Clasificado en
Artículos originales>
Expertos del Mundo

Especialidad principal:
Cirugía


Relacionadas:
Medicina Interna
 
 
 
 
 
 
Está expresamente prohibida la redistribución y la redifusión de todo o parte de los contenidos de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica (SIIC) S.A. sin previo y expreso consentimiento de SIIC.
ua31618
Home

Copyright siicsalud © 1997-2024 ISSN siicsalud: 1667-9008