Artículos relacionadosArtículos relacionadosArtículos relacionados
Artículos afines de siicsalud publicados en los últimos 4 meses

COMPARACIONES Y RESULTADOS CLINICOS EN EL CANCER DE MAMA: TAMOXIFENO E INHIBIDORES DE LA AROMATASA ADYUVANTES

(especial para SIIC © Derechos reservados)
Revisión de las diversas estrategias farmacológicas disponibles en el tratamiento del cáncer de mama, a través del análisis de la eficacia de los distintas terapias neoadyuvantes con los inhibidores de la aromatasa en comparación con la utilización del tamoxifeno.
mdixon9.jpg Autor:
J. michael Dixon
Columnista Experto de SIIC

Institución:
Edinburgh Breast Unit Western General Hospital


Artículos publicados por J. michael Dixon
Coautores
E. Jane Macaskill*  Juliette Jackson*  Lorna Renshaw**  William R. Miller*** 
MBChB, MRCS. Edinburgh Breast Unit, Western General Hospital*
RGN. Edinburgh Breast Unit, Western General Hospital**
BSc, PhD, DSc. Edinburgh Breast Unit, Western General Hospital***
Recepción del artículo
11 de Enero, 2005
Aprobación
17 de Enero, 2005
Primera edición
24 de Noviembre, 2005
Segunda edición, ampliada y corregida
7 de Junio, 2021

Resumen
La terapia hormonal neoadyuvante en las pacientes posmenopáusicas con cáncer mamario positivo para los receptores estrogénicos (ER) o de progesterona (PgR), ya sean tumores grandes y resecables o con enfermedad local avanzada, es una opción terapéutica efectiva y segura a la quimioterapia. Los ensayos aleatorizados demostraron que la tasa de respuesta obtenida con el inhibidor de la aromatasa letrozol es mayor que con tamoxifeno. La incidencia y la capacidad de retrogradar el estadio tumoral (downstaging) es superior con el letrozol y el anastrozol que con el tamoxifeno. Los tumores de cualquier nivel de ER parecen responder mejor al letrozol que al tamoxifeno, pero los que poseen niveles de ER bajos solamente responden al letrozol y no al tamoxifeno. Aquellas mujeres que expresen los niveles más altos de ER (Allred 7 y 8) serán quienes más se beneficien con la terapia adyuvante, obteniéndose así las mayores reducciones del tamaño tumoral. Tanto el letrozol como el anastrozol parecen ser más efectivos que el tamoxifeno en los cánceres de mama positivos para el HER2. Para determinar si un tumor responderá a la terapia son necesarios tres meses de tratamiento. La tasa de recurrencia anual es menor al 1% tras la cirugía mamaria conservadora y la radioterapia posteriores a la retrogradación del estadio tumoral con la terapia endocrina neoadyuvante.

Palabras clave
Neoadyuvante, tamoxifeno, inhibidores de la aromatasa, cáncer de mama


Artículo completo

(castellano)
Extensión:  +/-13.27 páginas impresas en papel A4
Exclusivo para suscriptores/assinantes

Abstract
Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for post menopausal patients with oestrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PgR) positive large operable or locally advanced breast cancer is an effective and safe alternative to chemotherapy. Randomised trials have demonstrated that the response rate with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole is greater than with tamoxifen. The incidence and degree of downstaging is greater with both letrozole and anastrozole than with tamoxifen. Tumours at all levels of ER appear to respond better to letrozole than tamoxifen, but at low levels of ER responses are seen only with letrozole and not with tamoxifen. Patients most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant therapy and those who achieve the greatest reduction in tumour volume are those patients whose tumours express high levels of ER (Allred category scores 7 and 8). Both letrozole and anastrozole appear more effective than tamoxifen in HER2 positive breast cancers. Three months of treatment is adequate to determine if a tumour will respond. Following breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy after down staging with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, the annual local recurrence rate is less than 1%.

Key words
Neoadjuvant, tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, breast cancer


Full text
(english)
para suscriptores/ assinantes

Clasificación en siicsalud
Artículos originales > Expertos del Mundo >
página   www.siicsalud.com/des/expertocompleto.php/

Especialidades
Principal: Oncología
Relacionadas: Farmacología, Medicina Familiar, Medicina Farmacéutica, Medicina Interna, Obstetricia y Ginecología



Comprar este artículo
Extensión: 13.27 páginas impresas en papel A4

file05.gif (1491 bytes) Artículos seleccionados para su compra



Bibliografía del artículo
  1. Bear H. Indications for neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Semin Oncol 1998; 25 Suppl 3:3-12.
  2. Perloff M, LesnickGJ. Chemotherapy before and after mastectomy in stage III breast cancer. Arch Surg 1982;117:879-881.
  3. Schick P, Goodstein J, Moor J, Butler J, Senter KL. Preoperative chemotherapy followed by mastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 1983; 22:278-282.
  4. Bonadonna G, Veronesi U, Brambilla C et al. Primary chemotherapy to avoid mastectomy in tumors with diameters of 3 cm or more. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82:1539-1545.
  5. Semiglazov VF, Semiglazov V, Ivanov V et al. The relative efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy vs. chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with ER- positive breast cancer. J Clin Onc 2004; 22 (14s):519.
  6. Smith I, Dowsett M, on behalf of the IMPACT Trialists. Comparison of anastrozole vs. tamoxifen alone and in combination as neoadjuvant treatment of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) operable breast cancer in postmenopausal women: the IMPACT trial. 26th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, Abstract 1 Presented Dec 3, 2003.
  7. Cataliotti L on behalf of the PROACT trialists. Efficacy of PreOperative Anastrozole Compared with Tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Eur J Ca 2004; in press.
  8. Eiermann W, Paepke S, Appfelstaedt J et al., Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: a randomized double-blind multicenter study. Ann Oncol 2001;12:1527-1532.
  9. Ellis MJ, Coop A, Singh B et al., Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for erbB-1- and/or erbB-2-positive, oestrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3808-3816.
  10. Gazet JC, Ford HT, Coombes RC, et al., Prospective randomized trial of tamoxifen vs. surgery in elderly patients with breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1994; 20(3):207-14.
  11. Kenny FS, Robertson JFR, Ellis IO, Elston CW, Blamey RW. Long-term follow-up of elderly patients randomised to primary tamoxifen or wedge mastectomy as initial therapy for operable breast cancer. The Breast 1998; 7:335-339.
  12. Fentiman IS, Christiaens MR, Paridaens R et al., Treatment of operable breast cancer in the elderly: a randomised clinical trial EORTC 10851 comparing tamoxifen alone with modified radical mastectomy. Eur J Ca 2003; 39:306-316.
  13. Mustacchi G, Ceccherini R, Milani S et al., Tamoxifen alone versus adjuvant tamoxifen for operable breast cancer of the elderly: long-term results of the phase III randomized controlled multicenter GRETA trial. Ann Oncol 2003; 14(3):414-20.
  14. Fennessy, M, Bates T, MacRae K, Riley D, Houghton J, Baum M, on behalf of the Closed Trials Working Party of the Cancer Research UK Breast Cancer Trials Group. Late follow-up of a randomized trial of surgery plus tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone in women aged over 70 years with operable breast cancer. Br J Surg 2004; 91(6):699-704.
  15. Bates T, Fennessy M, Riley DL, Baum M, Houghton J, MacRae K. On behalf of the CRC Breast Cancer Trails Group UK. Breast Cancer in the Elderly: Surgery improves survival. The results of a Cancer Research Campaign Trial. Eur J Ca 2001; 37 (supp 5):0-19.
  16. Dixon JM, Love CDB, Bellamy COC et al. Letrozole as primary medical therapy for locally advanced and large operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001; 66 (3):191-199.
  17. Smith I. Anastrozole versus tamoxifen as preoperative therapy for oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women: Combined analysis of the IMPACT and PROACT trials. Presented at 4th European Breast Cancer Conference 2004, Hamburg, Germany.
  18. Semiglazov VF, Semiglazov VV, Ivanov VG. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: exemestane (E) vs tamoxifen (T) in postmenopausal ER+ breast cancer patients (T1-4N1-2MO) 26th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2003; Abs 111.
  19. Dixon JM, Renshaw L, Bellamy C, Stuart M, Hoctin-Boes G and Miller WR. The effects of neoadjuvant anastrozole (Arimidex) on tumor volume in postmenopausal women with breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind, single-center study. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6:2229-2235.
  20. Dixon JM, Jackson J, Hills M, Renshaw L, Cameron DA, Anderson TJ, Miller WR, Dowsett M. Anastrozole demonstrates clinical and biological effectiveness in erbB2 ER positive breast cancers. Eur J Ca, in press.
  21. Young O, Murray J, Renshaw L et al. Neoadjuvant letrozole is equally effective in HER2 positive and negative breast cancers. 27th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2004 Abstract to be presented.
  22. Goldie JH. Scientific basis for adjuvant and primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy. Semin Oncol 1987;14:1.
  23. Dixon JM. Neoadjuvant therapy: surgical perspectives, in: W.R. Miller, J.N. Ingle (Eds.), Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002, pp. 197-212.
  24. Dixon JM, Renshaw L, Murray J et al. Is there an optimal duration of neoadjuvant letrozole therapy 27th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2004 Abstract to be presented.
  25. Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Brambilla C et al., Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer with chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy. Semin Oncol 1991; 15:515-524.
  26. Moneer M, El-Didi M, Khaled H. Breast conservation surgery: is it appropriate for locally advanced breast cancer following downstaging by neoadjuvant chemotherapy–a pathological assessment. The Breast 1999; 8:315-319.
  27. Dixon JM, Anderson TJ, Miller WR. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancer: a surgical perspective. Eur J Cancer, in press.
  28. Veronesi U, Bonadonna G, Zurrida S et al., Conservation surgery after primary chemotherapy in large carcinomas of the breast. Ann Surg 1995; 222:612-618.
  29. Makris A, Powles TJ, Ashley SE, et al., A reduction in the requirements for mastectomy in a randomised trial of neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in primary breast cancer. Ann Oncol 1998; 9:1179-1184.
  30. Kurtz JM. Should surgery remain the initial treatment of operable breast cancer Eur J Cancer 1991; 27(12): 1539-1542.
  31. Fisher B, Bryant J, Womark N, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16(8):2672-2678.
  32. Mauriac L, Durand M, Avril A, Dilhuydy JM. Effects of primary chemotherapy in conservative treatment of breast cancer patients with operable tumours larger than 3 cm. Results of a randomised trial in a single centre. Ann Oncol 1991;2(5):347-354.
  33. Semiglazov VF, Topuzov EE, Bavli JL et al., Primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with primary radiotherapy alone in stage IIb–IIIa breast cancer. Ann Oncol 1994; 5 (7):591-595.
  34. Cameron DA, Jack W, Forouhi P, Keen J, Dixon JM, Leonard RCF, Chetty U. Oestrogen receptor directed primary systemic therapy: a randomised trial compared with conventional therapy in operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002; 76 Suppl. S5 Abstract 157.

Título español
Resumen
 Palabras clave
 Bibliografía
 Artículo completo
(exclusivo a suscriptores)
 Autoevaluación
  Tema principal en SIIC Data Bases
 Especialidades

 English title
 Abstract
 Key words
Full text
(exclusivo a suscriptores)

Autor 
Artículos
Correspondencia

Patrocinio y reconocimiento
Imprimir esta página
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Está expresamente prohibida la redistribución y la redifusión de todo o parte de los contenidos de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica (SIIC) S.A. sin previo y expreso consentimiento de SIIC.
Artículos relacionadosMás relacionadosAtículos relacionados
LA ASPIRINA COMO TRATAMIENTO ADYUVANTE PARA EL CÁNCER DE MAMA
JAMA 331(20):1714-1721
Difundido en siicsalud: 15 nov 2024
ua31618
Home

Copyright siicsalud © 1997-2024 ISSN siicsalud: 1667-9008