RESUMEN Y ACTUALIZACION DEL ARTICULO “VACUNAS CONTRA ESTUPEFACIENTES: ¿UNA OPCION TERAPEUTICA VIABLE”

(especial para SIIC © Derechos reservados)
Es necesario disponer de normas éticas antes de que los tratamientos con vacunas o anticuerpos monoclonales dirigidos contra diferentes estupefacientes pasen a formar parte de la práctica médica cotidiana.
kantak9.jpg Autor:
Kathleen m. Kantak
Columnista Experto de SIIC

Institución:
Boston University


Artículos publicados por Kathleen m. Kantak
Recepción del artículo
9 de Agosto, 2005
Aprobación
26 de Agosto, 2005
Primera edición
16 de Marzo, 2006
Segunda edición, ampliada y corregida
7 de Junio, 2021

Resumen
A partir de la publicación del artículo de revisión “Vacunas dirigidas contra los estupefacientes: ¿una opción terapéutica viable”, aparecido en 2003, han surgido nuevos datos, ideas y abordajes. Este trabajo aporta un resumen del artículo publicado en la revista Drugs y una actualización acerca de los datos más nuevos desde que se publicara la mencionada revisión. Diversos estupefacientes han sido blanco de la inmunoterapia, como la cocaína, la nicotina, la fenciclidina, la metamfetamina y la heroína. Las vacunas contra la cocaína y la nicotina progresaron a ensayos clínicos de fase II, basados en el éxito de los estudios clínicos de fase I y de los preclínicos. Los resultados iniciales son alentadores pero aún persiste el problema sobre la variabilidad de las concentraciones séricas de los anticuerpos. Se ha descrito una nueva vacuna contra la heroína –que utiliza un transportador proteico novedoso– y apropiada para su empleo en seres humanos. Esta vacuna es capaz de inducir una respuesta inmune diez veces mayor que la vacuna contra estupefacientes más inmunogénica existente en la actualidad. Con esta nueva proteína transportadora, el problema que produce la repuesta variable a los anticuerpos podría ser superado. Otros abordajes como los anticuerpos monoclonales humanizados para potenciar la inmunidad pasiva contra un estupefaciente y las partículas de bacteriófagos obtenidas mediante bioingeniería que se unen al estupefaciente en el cerebro en vez de la circulación sistémica se agregan a la lista de las nuevas ideas para el tratamiento de personas vacunadas con concentraciones séricas bajas de anticuerpos.

Palabras clave
Vacunas, abuso de drogas, inmunoterapia, pruebas preclínicas, pruebas clínicas


Artículo completo

(castellano)
Extensión:  +/-6.92 páginas impresas en papel A4
Exclusivo para suscriptores/assinantes

Abstract
Since the review article “Vaccines against drugs of abuse: a viable treatment option” appeared in 2003, several new data, ideas and approaches have emerged. This article provides a summary of the Drugs article and an update on “what’s new” since its publication. A number of drugs of abuse have been targeted for immunotherapy, including cocaine, nicotine, phencyclidine, methamphetamine and heroin. Vaccines for cocaine and nicotine have progressed to phase 2 clinical trials, based on the success of preclinical and phase 1 clinical testing. Early results are encouraging, but the problem of variable serum antibody concentrations remains. A new heroin vaccine has been described that uses a novel carrier protein appropriate for use in humans and capable of inducing an immune response that is at least 10-fold greater than the most immunogenic drug abuse vaccine to date. With this novel carrier protein, the problem of a variable antibody response may be overcome. Other approaches such as humanized monoclonal antibodies to passively boost immunity against a drug of abuse and engineered bacteriophage particles that bind the drug of abuse in the brain rather than the bloodstream add to the list of new ideas for treating vaccinated individuals with low serum antibody concentrations.

Key words
Vaccines, drug abuse, immunotherapy, preclinical testing, clinical testing


Full text
(english)
para suscriptores/ assinantes

Clasificación en siicsalud
Artículos originales > Expertos del Mundo >
página   www.siicsalud.com/des/expertocompleto.php/

Especialidades
Principal: Inmunología, Toxicología
Relacionadas: Farmacología, Medicina Interna, Salud Mental, Salud Pública



Comprar este artículo
Extensión: 6.92 páginas impresas en papel A4

file05.gif (1491 bytes) Artículos seleccionados para su compra



Bibliografía del artículo
  1. Bonese KF, Wainer BH, Fitch FW, et al. Changes in heroin self-administration by a rhesus monkey after morphine immunization. Nature 1974; 252:708-10.
  2. Landry DW, Zhao K, Yang GX, et al. Antibody-catalyzed degradation of cocaine. Science 1993; 259:1899-1901.
  3. Yang G, Chun J, Arakawa-Uramoto H, et al. Anti-cocaine catalytic antibodies: A synthetic approach to improved antibody diversity. J Am Chem Soc 1996; 118:5881-90.
  4. Mets B, Winger G, Cabrera C, et al. A catalytic antibody against cocaine prevents cocaine's reinforcing and toxic effects in rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:10176-81.
  5. Bagasra O, Forman LJ, Howeedy A, et al. A potential vaccine for cocaine abuse prophylaxis. Immmunopharmacology 1992; 23:173-9.
  6. Carrera MRA, Ashley JA, Parsons LH, et al. Suppression of psychoactive effects of cocaine by active immunization. Nature 1995; 378:727-30.
  7. Carrera MRA, Ashley JA, Zhou B, et al. Cocaine vaccines: Antibody protection against relapse in a rat model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000 97:6202-6.
  8. Carrera MR, Ashley JA, Wirsching P, et al. A second-generation vaccine protects against the psychoactive effects of cocaine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001 98:1988-92.
  9. Ettinger RH, Ettinger WF, Harless WE. Active immunization with cocaine-protein conjugate attenuates cocaine effects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1997; 58:215-20.
  10. Johnson MW, Ettinger RH. Active cocaine immunization attenuates the discriminative properties of cocaine. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2000 ; 8:163-7.
  11. Fox BS, Kantak KM, Edwards MA, et al. Efficacy of a therapeutic cocaine vaccine in rodent models. Nature Medicine 1996; 2:1129-32.
  12. Kantak KM, Collins SL, Lipman EG, et al. Evaluation of anti-cocaine antibodies and a cocaine vaccine in a rat self-administration model. Psychopharmacology 2000; 148:251-62.
  13. Kantak KM, Collins SL, Bond J, et al. Time course of changes in cocaine self-administration behavior during immunization with the cocaine vaccine IPC-1010. Psychopharmacology 2001; 153:334-40.
  14. Kosten TR, Rosen M, Bond J, et al. Human therapeutic cocaine vaccine: safety and immunogenicity. Vaccine 2002; 20:1196-1204.
  15. Hieda Y, Keyler DE, Vandevoort JT, et al. Active immunization alters the plasma nicotine concentration in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997; 283:1076-81.
  16. Tuncok Y, Hieda Y, Keyler DE, et al. Inhibition of nicotine-induced seizures in rats by combining vaccination against nicotine with chronic nicotine infusion. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2001; 9:228-34.
  17. Shine B. Nicotine vaccine moves toward clinical trials online. 2000 cited 2005 July 6. Available from: URL: http://www.drugabuse.gov/NIDA_Notes/NNVol15N5/Vaccine.html.
  18. Kasaian M. Development of a vaccine for treatment of nicotine dependence online. 1998 cited 2005 July 6. Available from: URL: http://www.nida.nih.gov/MeetSum/Peripheral/abstracts.html#kasaian.
  19. Xenova Group plc. TA-NIC online. 2004 cited 2005 July 6. Available from: URL: http://www.cantab.co.uk/dc_ta_nic.html.
  20. Valentine JL, Mayersohn M, Wessinger WD, et al. Antiphencyclidine monoclonal Fab fragments reverse phencyclidine-induced behavioral effects and ataxia in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1996; 278:709-16.
  21. Valentine JL, Owens SM. Antiphencyclidine monoclonal antibody therapy significantly changes phencyclidine concentrations in brain and other tissues in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1996; 278:717-24.
  22. Byrnes-Blake KA, Carroll FI, Abraham P, et al. Generation of anti- (+)methamphetamine antibodies is not impeded by (+)methamphetamine administration during active immunization of rats. Int Immunopharmacol 2001; 1:329-38.
  23. Martell BA, Mitchell E, Poling J, et al. Vaccine pharmacotherapy for the treatment of cocaine dependence. 66th Annual Meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence, 2004.
  24. Maurer P, Jennings GT, Willers J, et al. A therapeutic vaccine for nicotine dependence: preclinical efficacy, and phase I safety and immunogenicity. Eur J Immunol 2005; 35:2031-2040.
  25. Redwan el-RM, Larsen NA, Zhou B, et al. Expression and characterization of a humanized cocaine-binding antibody. Biotechnol Bioeng 2003; 5:612-618.
  26. Keyler DE, Roiko SA, Benlhabib E, et al. Monoclonal nicotine-specific antibodies reduce nicotine distribution to brain in rats: dose- and affinity-response relationships. Drug Metab Dispos 2005; 33:1056-1061.
  27. McMillan DE, Hardwick WC, Li M, et al. Effects of murine-derived anti-methamphetamine monoclonal antibodies on (+)-methamphetamine self-administration in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2004; 309:1248-1255.
  28. Dickerson TJ, Kaufmann GF, Janda KD. Bacteriophage-mediated protein delivery into the central nervous system and its application in immunopharmacotherapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2005; 5:773-781.
  29. Anton B, Leff P. Intravenous self-administration of morphine and heroin is prevented after active immunization with a morphine vaccine in the rodent. 63rd Annual Meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence 2001.
  30. Anton B, Leff P. Addictive morphine and heroin self-administration behavior is prevented after active immunization with a morphine vaccine in the rodent. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., Vol. 27, Program No. 685.7, 2001.
  31. Cohen PJ. Immunization for prevention and treatment of cocaine abuse: Legal and ethical implications. Drug Alcohol Depend 1997; 48:167-74.
  32. Hall W, Carter L. Ethical issues in using a cocaine vaccine to treat and prevent cocaine abuse and dependence. J Med Ethics 2004; 30:337-340.
  33. Goodchild S, Bloomfield S. Children to get jabs against drug addiction. The Independent 2004 July 25.
  34. Harwood HJ, Myers TG, editors). New Treatments For Addiction: Behavioral, Ethical, Legal, and Social Questions. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2004.
  35. Kantak, KM. Vaccines against drugs of abuse: a viable treatment option Drugs 2003; 63:341-352.

Título español
Resumen
 Palabras clave
 Bibliografía
 Artículo completo
(exclusivo a suscriptores)
 Autoevaluación
  Tema principal en SIIC Data Bases
 Especialidades

 English title
 Abstract
 Key words
Full text
(exclusivo a suscriptores)

Autor 
Artículos
Correspondencia

Patrocinio y reconocimiento
Imprimir esta página
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Está expresamente prohibida la redistribución y la redifusión de todo o parte de los contenidos de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica (SIIC) S.A. sin previo y expreso consentimiento de SIIC.
ua31618
Home

Copyright siicsalud © 1997-2024 ISSN siicsalud: 1667-9008