Expertos Invitados





BENEFICIOS DE LA TELEPRACTICA EN EL ABORDAJE FONOAUDIOLOGICO

(especial para SIIC © Derechos reservados)
La telepráctica es un modelo de prestación de servicios fonoaudiológicos y audiológicos en el cual se emplea la tecnología de las telecomunicaciones con fines de promoción y prevención, evaluación, intervención o consulta. Debido a la pandemia de COVID-19, este tipo de servicios tuvo un crecimiento significativo para dar respuesta a las necesidades de salud de individuos y poblaciones.
Autor:
Ana carmenza Romero peña
Columnista Experta de SIIC

Institución:
Fundación Escuela Colombiana de Rehabilitación

Artículos publicados por Ana carmenza Romero peña
Coautores
Maria Camila Pinzón Díaz* Jeison Monroy Gómez** 
Fonoaudióloga, Fundación Universitaria Escuela Colombiana de Rehabilitación, Bogotá, Colombia*
Biólogo, Fundación Universitaria Escuela Colombiana de Rehabilitación, Bogotá, Colombia**

BENEFICIOS DE LA TELEPRACTICA EN EL ABORDAJE FONOAUDIOLOGICO

Resumen
Introducción: La telepráctica es un modelo de prestación de servicios fonoaudiológicos y audiológicos en el cual se emplea la tecnología de las telecomunicaciones con fines de promoción y prevención, evaluación, intervención o consulta. Debido a la pandemia de COVID-19, este tipo de servicios tuvo un crecimiento significativo para dar respuesta a las necesidades de salud de individuos y poblaciones. Objetivo: Describir el abordaje fonoaudiológico a través de la telepráctica en la intervención de las deficiencias de la comunicación. Método: Se realizó una búsqueda en las bases de datos de PubMed y American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA); se emplearon ecuaciones de búsqueda en inglés. Se seleccionaron 28 artículos desde el año 2016, y se analizaron las categorías de telepráctica en audiología, telepráctica en voz y habla y telepráctica en lenguaje. Análisis de la información: El uso de la telepráctica ha sido fundamental para aumentar la accesibilidad a servicios fonoaudiológicos para individuos y poblaciones que se encuentran en zonas apartadas, así como en el abordaje de deficiencias específicas y en el seguimiento de procesos de rehabilitación empleando la tecnología como herramienta. La telepráctica ha permitido mejorar los procesos de formación de padres y cuidadores, que permiten la implementación de acciones terapéuticas en casa. Conclusión: La telepráctica ha demostrado tener resultados similares a los abordajes presenciales, lo que demuestra que, en el futuro, podría convertirse en una alternativa para la práctica fonoaudiológica y audiológica. Es necesario aumentar las investigaciones que respalden el uso de la telepráctica, así como para determinar los estándares mínimos para su implementación.

Palabras clave
fonoaudiología, telepráctica, telemedicina, audiología, habla y voz


Artículo completo
(castellano)
Extensión:  +/-7.71 páginas impresas en papel A4
Exclusivo para suscriptores/assinantes

Use of telepractice in the phonoaudiological approach to human communication and its deficiencies: review

Abstract
Introduction: Telepractice is a model for the provision of speech therapy and audiological services in which telecommunications technology is used for the purposes of promotion and prevention, evaluation, intervention and / or consultation, due to the pandemic this type of service had significant growth to respond to the health needs of individuals and populations. Objective: To describe the speech therapy approach through telepractice in the intervention of communication deficiencies. Method: A search was carried out in the databases of Pubmed and American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), search equations were used in English, 28 articles were selected since 2016 and the telepractic categories in audiology were analyzed. telepractic in voice and speech and telepractic in language. Information analysis: the use of telepractice has been fundamental to increase the accessibility to speech therapy services for individuals and populations that are in remote areas; as well as in addressing specific deficiencies and in monitoring rehabilitation processes using technology as a tool. Telepractice has made it possible to improve the training processes for parents and caregivers that allow the implementation of therapeutic actions at home. Conclusion: telepractice has shown to have similar results to face-to-face approaches, which shows that in the future it will become an alternative for speech therapy and audiological practice. There is a need to increase research to support the use of telepractic, as well as to determine the minimum standards for its implementation.

Key words
speech, language and hearing sciences, telepractice, telemedicine, audiology, speech and language

Clasificación en siicsalud
Artículos originales > Expertos de Iberoamérica >
página   www.siicsalud.com/des/expertocompleto.php/

Especialidades
Principal: Fonoaudiología, Otorrinolaringología
Relacionadas: Educación Médica, Salud Pública



Comprar este artículo
Extensión: 7.71 páginas impresas en papel A4

file05.gif (1491 bytes) Artículos seleccionados para su compra



Enviar correspondencia a:
Ana Carmenza Romero Peña, Fundación Escuela Colombiana de Rehabilitación, Bogotá, Colombia
Bibliografía del artículo
1. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Inmunidad colectiva, confinamientos y COVID-19. 2020. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/herd-immunity-lockdowns-and-covid-19.
2. Tohidast SA, Mansuri B, Bagheri R, Azimi H. Provision of speech-language pathology services for the treatment of speech and language disorders in children during the COVID-19 pandemic: Problems, concerns, and solutions. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 138:110262, 2020.
3. Steuerwald W, Windmill I, Scott M, Evans T, Kramer K. Stories from the webcams: Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Audiology Telehealth and Pediatric Auditory Device Services. Am J Audiol 27(3S):391-402, 2018.
4. Pierson LM, Thompson JL, Ganz JB, Wattanawongwan S, Haas AN, Yllades V. Coaching parents of children with developmental disabilities to implement a modified dialogic reading intervention using low technology via telepractice. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 30(1):119-136, 2021.
5. Shahouzaie N, Gholamiyan Arefi M. Telehealth in speech and language therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 1-8, 2022.
6. Ben-Aharon A. A practical guide to establishing an online speech therapy private practice. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups 4(4):712-718, 2019.
7. Cangi ME, To?ram B. Stuttering therapy through telepractice in Turkey: A mixed method study. J Fluency Disord 66:105793, 2020.
8. Grillo EU. A Nonrandomized trial for student teachers of an in-person and telepractice global voice prevention and therapy model with estill voice training assessed by the VoiceEvalU8 App. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 30(2):566-583, 2021.
9. Craig EA, Dounavi K, Ferguson J. Effectiveness of a brief functional analysis and functional communication training conducted through telehealth. J Dev Phys Disabil 35(2):227-246, 2023.
10. Manchaiah V, Vlaescu G, Varadaraj S, Parks Aronson E, Fagelson M, Munoz M, et al. Features, functionality, and acceptability of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for tinnitus in the United States. Am J Audiol 29(3):476-490, 2020.
11. Ramkumar V, Rajendran A, Nagarajan R, Balasubramaniyan S, Suresh DK. Identification and management of middle ear disorders in a rural cleft care program: a telemedicine approach. Am J Audiol 27(3S):455-461, 2018.
12. Murdin L, Sladen M, Williams H, Bamiou DE, Bibas A, Kikidis D, et al. EHealth and its role in supporting audiological rehabilitation: patient perspectives on barriers and facilitators of using a personal hearing support system with mobile application as part of the EVOTION Study. Front Public Health 9, 2022.
13. Brice S, Almond H. Is teleaudiology achieving person-centered care: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health19(12):7436, 2022.
14. Kim J, Jeon S, Kim D, Shin Y. A review of contemporary teleaudiology: literature review, technology, and considerations for practicing. J Audiol Otol 25(1):1-7, 2021.
15. Khatib N, Hlayisi VG. Is a hybrid of online and face-to-face services feasible for audiological rehabilitation post COVID-19? Findings from three public health patients. S Afr J Commun Disord 69(2):e1-e11, 2022.
16. Ratanjee-Vanmali H, Swanepoel DW, Laplante-Lévesque A. Characteristics, behaviours and readiness of persons seeking hearing healthcare online. Int J Audiol 58(2):107-115, 2019.
17. Beukes EW, Manchaiah V. Internet-based audiological interventions: an update for clinicians. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups 4(3):542-552, 2019.
18. Khoza-Shangase K, Lau J. Investigating hearing function in pediatric patients with renal dysfunction: in pursuit of preventive audiology outcomes. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74(S3):4189-4199, 2022.
19. Nihara M R NN, Seethapathy J. Tele-audiology in India: current and future trends in knowledge, attitude, and practice among audiologists. J Audiol Otol 26(3):130-141, 2022.
20. Elbeltagy R, Waly EH, Bakry HM. Teleaudiology practice in COVID-19 pandemic in Egypt and Saudi Arabia. J Otol 17(2):78-83, 2022.
21. Beukes EW, Andersson G, Manchaiah V. Long-term efficacy of audiologist-guided Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for tinnitus in the United States: A repeated-measures design. Internet Interv 30:100583, 2022.
22. Beukes EW, Allen PM, Baguley DM, Manchaiah V, Andersson G. Long-term efficacy of audiologist-guided internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for tinnitus. Am J Audiol 27(3S):431-447, 2018.
23. D'Onofrio KL, Zeng FG. Tele-audiology: current state and future directions. Front Digit Health 3, 2022.
24. Ramkumar V, John KR, Selvakumar K, Vanaja CS, Nagarajan R, Hall JW. Cost and outcome of a community-based paediatric hearing screening programme in rural India with application of tele-audiology for follow-up diagnostic hearing assessment. Int J Audiol 57(6):407-414, 2018.
25. Frisby C, Eikelboom RH, Mahomed-Asmail F, Kuper H, de Kock T, Manchaiah V, Swanepoel D. Community-based adult hearing care provided by community healthcare workers using mHealth technologies. Glob Health Action 15(1), 2022.
26. Tao KFM, Brennan-Jones CG, Capobianco-Fava DM, Jayakody D, Friedland P, Swanepoel D, Eikelboom E. Teleaudiology services for rehabilitation with hearing aids in adults: a systematic review. J Speech Lang Hear Res 61(7):1831-1849, 2018.
27. Philips B, Smits C, Govaerts PJ, Doorn I, Vanpoucke F. Empowering senior cochlear implant users at home via a tablet computer application. Am J Audiol 27(3S):417-430, 2018.
28. Horin AP, McNeely ME, Harrison EC, Myers P, Sutter E, Rawson K, Earhart G. Usability of a daily mHealth application designed to address mobility, speech and dexterity in Parkinson's disease. Neurodegener Dis Manag 9(2):97-105, 2019.
29. Theodoros D. Telerehabilitation for communication and swallowing disorders in Parkinson's disease. J Parkinsons Dis 11(s1):S65-S70, 2011.
30. Theodoros DG, Hill AJ, Russell TG. Clinical and quality of life outcomes of speech treatment for Parkinson's disease delivered to the home via telerehabilitation: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 25(2):214-232, 2016.
31. Bridgman K, Onslow M, O'Brian S, Jones M, Block S. Lidcombe program webcam treatment for early stuttering: a randomized controlled trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res 59(5):932-939, 2016.
32. Coufal K, Parham D, Jakubowitz M, Howell C, Reyes J. Comparing traditional service delivery and telepractice for speech sound production using a functional outcome measure. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 27(1):82-90, 2018.
33. Pullins V, Grogan-Johnson S. A Clinical decision making example: implementing intensive speech sound intervention for school-age students through telepractice. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups 2(18):15-26, 2017.
34. Doll EJ, Braden MN, Thibeault SL. COVID-19 and speech-language pathology clinical practice of voice and upper airway disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 30(1):63-74, 2021.
35. Kim ME, Sund LT, Morton M, Kim J, Choi JS, Castro ME. Provider and patient satisfaction with telemedicine voice therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Voice. 2022.
36. Kurland J, Liu A, Stokes P. Effects of a tablet-based home practice program with telepractice on treatment outcomes in chronic aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res 61(5):1140-1156, 2018.
37. Weidner K, Lowman J. Telepractice for adult speech-language pathology services: a systematic review. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups 5(1):326-338, 2020.
38. Dial H, Hinshelwood H, Grasso S, Hubbard HI, Gorno-Tempini ML, Henry M. Investigating the utility of teletherapy in individuals with primary progressive aphasia. Clin Interv Aging 14:453-471, 2019.
39. Sitren A, Vallila-Rohter S. How well do we use our technology? Examining iPad navigation skills in individuals with aphasia and older adults. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 28(4):1523-1536, 2019.
40. Cordes L, Loukanova S, Forstner J. Scoping review über die Wirksamkeit einer Screen-to-Screen-Therapie im Vergleich zu einer Face-to-Face-Therapie bei Patient*innen mit Aphasie auf die Benennleistungen. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 156-157:1-8, 2020.
41. Manning BL, Harpole A, Harriott EM, Postolowicz K, Norton ES. Taking language samples home: feasibility, reliability, and validity of child language samples conducted remotely with video chat versus in-person. J Speech Lang Hear Res 63(12):3982-3990, 2020.
42. Gallée J, Pittmann R, Pennington S, Vallila-Rohter S. The application of lexical retrieval training in tablet-based speech-language intervention. Front Neurol 11, 2020.
43. Simic T, Leonard C, Laird L, Cupit J, Höbler F, Rochon E. A usability study of internet-based therapy for naming deficits in aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 25(4):642-653, 2016.
44. Dekhtyar M, Braun EJ, Billot A, Foo L, Kiran S. Videoconference administration of the western aphasia battery-revised: feasibility and validity. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 29(2):673-687, 2020.
45. Teti S, Murray LL, Orange JB, Page AD, Kankam KS. Telehealth assessments and interventions for individuals with poststroke aphasia: a scoping review. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 32(3):1360-1375, 2023.
46. McNally Keehn R, Enneking B, Ryan T, James C, Tang Q, Blewitt A, et al. Tele-assessment of young children referred for autism spectrum disorder evaluation during COVID-19: Associations among clinical characteristics and diagnostic outcome. Autism 27(5):1362-1376, 2023.
47. Spain D, Stewart GR, Mason D, Milner V, Fairhurst B, Robinson J, et al. Telehealth autism diagnostic assessments with children, young people, and adults: qualitative interview study with England-wide multidisciplinary health professionals. JMIR Ment Health 9(7):e37901, 2022.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Está expresamente prohibida la redistribución y la redifusión de todo o parte de los contenidos de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica (SIIC) S.A. sin previo y expreso consentimiento de SIIC.
ua31618

Copyright siicsalud © 1997-2024 ISSN siicsalud: 1667-9008